I genuinely love to read. Always have. I admit I was the pretentious
kid who was reading Shakespeare in grade school, and thinking I understood it.
I've always loved Salinger – except for “Catcher in the Rye.” Ptooey. Yuck. How obnoxious and awful is Holden Caufield? I
went to school with people just like him; I didn’t need to read his
self-indulgent… oops, I digress.
Anyway, you’d think that as much as I like to hide from the
real world, I’d read a lot of fiction. You’d be wrong. The thing is, while just about anyone can
come up with an interesting idea that isn't enough. Good fiction is really, really hard to write.
Bad fiction, not so much.
Nothing annoys me more than starting a book with a good
premise and intriguing characters only to have it all fall apart halfway
through. When that happens I’m pissed with the characters and furious with the
writer for wasting my time.
At this point a normal person would close the book and walk
away. Not me. I have a weird tick where I absolutely cannot leave a book
unfinished.
Apparently I have reading OCD. You know how people with regular OCD have to
wash their hands a certain number of times, or check the lock on the door twice
before leaving or they drive themselves crazy? That’s me with an unfinished
book. I can’t ignore the unread pages.
It’s like being in a bad relationship. I keep going back to
the terrible book, knowing all the while that I’m going to be disappointed. I
convince myself time and time again that it will get better. It never does.
The latest example is the IT book of this season, City
on Fire. The story is very Bonfire
of the Vanities, (without the humor
or pizzaz), as it follows a group of
characters through a moment in 80s era New York.
Written by wonderkind Garth Risk Hallberg, it’s a first
novel that netted the author something north of $2 million after a vigorous
bidding war. With all that money invested, you’d think someone would have hired
an editor to oversee the project. Again you’d be wrong. In fact, I’m pretty
sure that the tome never went under a red pen.
The City on Fire literally weighs in at Godzilla-like
700-plus pages. (I don’t know exactly; I bought it on by Kindle. The idea of schelpping
a book that size around gave me pause.) But it’s not the length that forces me
to put it away every night after just a few brief chapters. It’s the writing.
It’s labored.
When I was in school, I was always taught to aim for the
brevity of Ernest Hemmingway. Mr. Hallberg must have missed that class. Where
good ole’ Ernest was known be so tight with words that some chapters run barely
a single page; Hallberg has never met a long flowery sentence he didn’t love.
His descriptions run into tangents and he love, love, loves his SAT words.
I love a good wordsmith, but constantly using terms that
force me to constantly flip back and forth to a dictionary is lame and
irritating. It not only takes me out of the story (which in this case is
tangential enough without interruptions) but it’s condescending. We get it;
you’re smart and know a lot of big words. Yay you.
You get the point: I kind of hate this book. And yet, every
night I chip away at it. I’m a fast reader, but I expect to be punishing myself
with City on Fire for at least another month. Ugh.
I love non-fiction. I ‘m convinced that just like a bad
merlot is better than a bad cabernet, bad non-fiction better than bad fiction. It’s
hard for even the worst writer to make fascinating people dull. Even though god knows they try.
Recently I’ve hit a vein of terrific non-fiction, some of
which has even popular. I’ll read
anything from Bill Bryson (some is better than others), Jon Krakauer (don’t
hold the film “Everest” against him) and Erik Larson (I never thought about the
Lusitania or the world’s fair before his books). Those are just some of the
great ones.
I’ve also read terribly written, but
really interesting books about flappers, stand-up comedy, Alan Turing, First
Ladies, the Roosevelts, hummingbirds and rock and roll managers. You get the drift.
Some of them were painfully bad. All could have been made better with good
editing. But they were still worth reading.
And yes, I finished them all.
Currently I have a backlog of books waiting to be read, including
some fiction. I’m sure that by the time
I finish slogging through City on Fire the list will be even
longer. According to my Kindle, I’m only
310 pages deep of 903. Which means I should be done sometime after the first of
the year.